Effects of Comparison and Explanation on Analogical Transfer

نویسندگان

  • Brian J. Edwards
  • Joseph Jay Williams
  • Dedre Gentner
  • Tania Lombrozo
چکیده

Although comparison and explanation have typically been studied independently, recent work suggests connections between these processes. Three experiments investigated effects of comparison and explanation on analogical problem solving. In Experiment 1, explaining the solutions to two analogous stories increased spontaneous transfer to an analogical problem. In Experiment 2, explaining a single story promoted analogical transfer, but only after receiving a hint that may have facilitated comparison. In Experiment 3, irrelevant stories were interspersed among the two story analogs to block unprompted comparison; prompts to compare were effective, but prompts to explain were not. This pattern suggests that effects of explanation on analogical transfer may be greatest when combined with comparison.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Transfer effects of prompted and self-reported analogical comparison and self-explanation

We compared types of transfer facilitated by instructions to engage in analogical comparison or self-explanation. Participants received learning materials and worked examples with prompts supporting analogical comparison, selfexplanation, or instructional explanation study. Learners also self-reported their use of analogical comparison and selfexplanation on a series of questionnaires. We evalu...

متن کامل

Explaining away the negative effects of evaluation on analogical transfer: the perils of premature evaluation.

Four experiments explored effects on analogical transfer of evaluating solutions to base problems. In contrast to reports of positive effects of explanation, evaluation consistently reduced transfer rates and impaired mental representations of base material. This effect was not ameliorated by encoding for a later memory test, summarizing, or engaging in similar processes at encoding and recall....

متن کامل

Bridging principles and examples through analogy and explanation

Previous research in cognitive science has shown that analogical comparison and self-explanation are two powerful learning activities that can improve conceptual learning in laboratory settings. The current work examines whether these results generalize to students learning physics in a classroom setting. Students were randomly assigned to one of three worked example learning conditions (readin...

متن کامل

Coordinating principles and examples through analogy and self-explanation

Research on expertise suggests that a critical aspect of expert understanding is knowledge of the relations between domain principles and problem features. We investigated two instructional pathways hypothesized to facilitate students’ learning of these relations when studying worked examples. The first path is through self-explaining how worked examples instantiate domain principles and the se...

متن کامل

'Capturing the relations between metacognition, self-explanation, and analogical comparison: An exploration of two methodologies'

Metacognitive processes such as monitoring and control and sense-making processes such as self-explanation and analogical comparison are each hypothesized to result in effective problem solving, learning and transfer (Chi et al., 1994; Alfieri, et al., 2013; Zepeda et al., 2015). However, little work has examined how these processes relate to one another and their associated learning outcomes. ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2014